Agent Skills by ALSEL
Anthropic Claudeソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 0品質スコア 50/100

build-perf-diagnostics

MSBuildのビルドパフォーマンスのボトルネックを、バイナリログ(binlog)解析によって診断するスキルです。`build-perf-baseline`でベースライン計測を済ませた後に使用し、ResolveAssemblyReferenceが5秒超・Roslynアナライザーがコンパイル時間の30%超・単一ターゲットが全体の50%超を占めるケースや、ノード使用率の低下・不要なCopyタスク・毎回実行されるNuGet復元など7つの典型的ボトルネックを特定します。初回ベースラインの確立・インクリメンタルビルドの問題・並列化チューニング・MSBuild以外のビルドシステムには対応しません。

description の原文を見る

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems. INVOKES: dotnet msbuild binlog replay with performancesummary, grep for analysis.

SKILL.md 本文

Performance Analysis Methodology

  1. Generate a binlog: dotnet build /bl:{} -m
  2. Replay to diagnostic log with performance summary:
    dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl -flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary
    
  3. Read the performance summary (at the end of full.log):
    grep "Target Performance Summary\|Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
    
  4. Find expensive targets and tasks: The PerformanceSummary section lists all targets/tasks sorted by cumulative time
  5. Check for node utilization: grep for scheduling and node messages
    grep -i "node.*assigned\|building with\|scheduler" full.log | head -30
    
  6. Check analyzers: grep for analyzer timing
    grep -i "analyzer.*elapsed\|Total analyzer execution time\|CompilerAnalyzerDriver" full.log
    

Key Metrics and Thresholds

  • Build duration: what's "normal" — small project <10s, medium <60s, large <5min
  • Node utilization: ideal is >80% active time across nodes. Low utilization = serialization bottleneck
  • Single target domination: if one target is >50% of build time, investigate
  • Analyzer time vs compile time: analyzers should be <30% of Csc task time. If higher, consider removing expensive analyzers
  • RAR time: ResolveAssemblyReference >5s is concerning. >15s is pathological

Common Bottlenecks

1. ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) Slowness

  • Symptoms: RAR taking >5s per project
  • Root causes: too many assembly references, network-based reference paths, large assembly search paths
  • Fixes: reduce reference count, use <DesignTimeBuild>false</DesignTimeBuild> for RAR-heavy analysis, set <ResolveAssemblyReferencesSilent>true</ResolveAssemblyReferencesSilent> for diagnostic
  • Advanced: <DesignTimeBuild> and <ResolveAssemblyWarnOrErrorOnTargetArchitectureMismatch>
  • Key insight: RAR runs unconditionally even on incremental builds because users may have installed targeting packs or GACed assemblies (see dotnet/msbuild#2015). With .NET Core micro-assemblies, the reference count is often very high.
  • Reduce transitive references: Set <DisableTransitiveProjectReferences>true</DisableTransitiveProjectReferences> to avoid pulling in the full transitive closure (note: projects may need to add direct references for any types they consume). Use ReferenceOutputAssembly="false" on ProjectReferences that are only needed at build time (not API surface). Trim unused PackageReferences.

2. Roslyn Analyzers and Source Generators

  • Symptoms: Csc task takes much longer than expected for file count (>2× clean compile time)
  • Diagnosis: Check the Task Performance Summary in the replayed log for Csc task time; grep for analyzer timing messages; compare Csc duration with and without analyzers (/p:RunAnalyzers=false)
  • Fixes:
    • Conditionally disable in dev: <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' != 'true'">false</RunAnalyzers>
    • Per-configuration: <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(Configuration)' == 'Debug'">false</RunAnalyzers>
    • Code-style only: <EnforceCodeStyleInBuild Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' == 'true'">true</EnforceCodeStyleInBuild>
    • Remove genuinely redundant analyzers from inner loop
    • Severity config in .editorconfig for less critical rules
  • Key principle: Preserve analyzer enforcement in CI. Never just "remove" analyzers — configure them conditionally.
  • GlobalPackageReference: Analyzers added via GlobalPackageReference in Directory.Packages.props apply to ALL projects. Consider if test projects need the same analyzer set as production code.
  • EnforceCodeStyleInBuild: When set to true in Directory.Build.props, forces code-style analysis on every build. Should be conditional on CI environment (ContinuousIntegrationBuild) to avoid slowing dev inner loop.

3. Serialization Bottlenecks (Single-threaded targets)

  • Symptoms: Performance summary shows most build time concentrated in a single project; diagnostic log shows idle nodes while one works
  • Common culprits: targets without proper dependency declaration, single project on critical path
  • Fixes: split large projects, optimize the critical path project, ensure proper BuildInParallel

4. Excessive File I/O (Copy tasks)

  • Symptoms: Copy task shows high aggregate time
  • Root causes: copying thousands of files, copying across network drives, Copy task unintentionally running once per item (per-file) instead of as a single batch (see dotnet/msbuild#12884)
  • Fixes: use hardlinks (<CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>true</CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>), reduce CopyToOutputDirectory items, use <UseCommonOutputDirectory>true</UseCommonOutputDirectory> when appropriate, set <SkipCopyUnchangedFiles>true</SkipCopyUnchangedFiles>, consider --artifacts-path (.NET 8+) for centralized output layout
  • Dev Drive: On Windows, switching to a Dev Drive (ReFS with copy-on-write and reduced Defender scans) can significantly reduce file I/O overhead for Copy-heavy builds. Recommend for both dev machines and self-hosted CI agents.

5. Evaluation Overhead

  • Symptoms: build starts slow before any compilation
  • Root causes: complex Directory.Build.props, wildcard globs scanning large directories, NuGetSdkResolver overhead (adds 180-400ms per project evaluation even when restored — see dotnet/msbuild#4025)
  • Fixes: reduce Directory.Build.props complexity, use <EnableDefaultItems>false</EnableDefaultItems> for legacy projects with explicit file lists, avoid NuGet-based SDK resolvers if possible
  • See: eval-performance skill for detailed guidance

6. NuGet Restore in Build

  • Symptoms: restore runs every build even when unnecessary
  • Fixes:
    • Separate restore from build: dotnet restore then dotnet build --no-restore
    • Enable static graph evaluation: <RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>true</RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation> in Directory.Build.props — can save significant time in large builds (results are workload-dependent)

7. Large Project Count and Graph Shape

  • Symptoms: many small projects, each takes minimal time but overhead adds up; deep dependency chains serialize the build
  • Consider: project consolidation, or use /graph mode for better scheduling
  • Graph shape matters: a wide dependency graph (few levels, many parallel branches) builds faster than a deep one (many levels, serialized). Refactoring from deep to wide can yield significant improvements in both clean and incremental build times.
  • Actions: look for unnecessary project dependencies, consider splitting a bottleneck project into two, or merging small leaf projects

Using Binlog Replay for Performance Analysis

Step-by-step workflow using text log replay:

  1. Replay with performance summary:
    dotnet msbuild build.binlog -noconlog -fl -flp:v=diag;logfile=full.log;performancesummary
    
  2. Read target/task performance summaries (at the end of full.log):
    grep "Target Performance Summary\|Task Performance Summary" -A 50 full.log
    
    This shows all targets and tasks sorted by cumulative time — equivalent to finding expensive targets/tasks.
  3. Find per-project build times:
    grep "done building project\|Project Performance Summary" full.log
    
  4. Check parallelism (multi-node scheduling):
    grep -i "node.*assigned\|RequiresLeadingNewline\|Building with" full.log | head -30
    
  5. Check analyzer overhead:
    grep -i "Total analyzer execution time\|analyzer.*elapsed\|CompilerAnalyzerDriver" full.log
    
  6. Drill into a specific slow target:
    grep 'Target "CoreCompile"\|Target "ResolveAssemblyReferences"' full.log
    

Quick Wins Checklist

  • Use /maxcpucount (or -m) for parallel builds
  • Separate restore from build (dotnet restore then dotnet build --no-restore)
  • Enable static graph restore (<RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>true</RestoreUseStaticGraphEvaluation>)
  • Enable hardlinks for Copy (<CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>true</CreateHardLinksForCopyFilesToOutputDirectoryIfPossible>)
  • Disable analyzers conditionally in dev inner loop: <RunAnalyzers Condition="'$(ContinuousIntegrationBuild)' != 'true'">false</RunAnalyzers>
  • Enable reference assemblies (<ProduceReferenceAssembly>true</ProduceReferenceAssembly>)
  • Check for broken incremental builds (see incremental-build skill)
  • Check for bin/obj clashes (see check-bin-obj-clash skill)
  • Use graph build (/graph) for multi-project solutions
  • Use --artifacts-path (.NET 8+) for centralized output layout
  • Enable Dev Drive (ReFS) on Windows dev machines and self-hosted CI

Impact Categorization

When reporting findings, categorize by impact to help prioritize fixes:

  • 🔴 HIGH IMPACT (do first): Items consuming >10% of total build time, or a single target >50% of build time
  • 🟡 MEDIUM IMPACT: Items consuming 2-10% of build time
  • 🟢 QUICK WINS: Easy changes with modest impact (e.g., property flags in Directory.Build.props)

ライセンス: MIT(寛容ライセンスのため全文を引用しています) · 原本リポジトリ

詳細情報

作者
dotnet
リポジトリ
dotnet/skills
ライセンス
MIT
最終更新
不明

Source: https://github.com/dotnet/skills / ライセンス: MIT

関連スキル

汎用ソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 39,967

doubt-driven-development

重要な判断はすべて、本番環境への展開前に新しい視点から対抗的レビューを実施します。速度より正確性が重要な場合、不慣れなコードを扱う場合、本番環境・セキュリティに関わるロジック・取り消し不可の操作など影響度が高い場合、または後でバグを修正するよりも今検証する方が効率的な場合に活用してください。

by addyosmani
汎用ソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 1,175

apprun-skills

TypeScriptを使用したAppRunアプリケーションのMVU設計に関する総合的なガイダンスが得られます。コンポーネントパターン、イベントハンドリング、状態管理(非同期ジェネレータを含む)、パラメータと保護機能を備えたルーティング・ナビゲーション、vistestを使用したテストに対応しています。AppRunコンポーネントの設計・レビュー、ルートの配線、状態フローの管理、AppRunテストの作成時に活用してください。

by yysun
OpenAIソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 797

desloppify

コードベースのヘルスチェックと技術負債の追跡ツールです。コード品質、技術負債、デッドコード、大規模ファイル、ゴッドクラス、重複関数、コードスメル、命名規則の問題、インポートサイクル、結合度の問題についてユーザーが質問した場合に使用してください。また、ヘルススコアの確認、次の改善項目の提案、クリーンアップ計画の作成をリクエストされた際にも対応します。29言語に対応しています。

by Git-on-my-level
汎用ソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 39,967

debugging-and-error-recovery

テストが失敗したり、ビルドが壊れたり、動作が期待と異なったり、予期しないエラーが発生したりした場合に、体系的な根本原因デバッグをガイドします。推測ではなく、根本原因を見つけて修正するための体系的なアプローチが必要な場合に使用してください。

by addyosmani
汎用ソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 39,967

test-driven-development

テスト駆動開発により実装を進めます。ロジックの実装、バグの修正、動作の変更など、あらゆる場面で活用できます。コードが正常に動作することを証明する必要がある場合、バグ報告を受けた場合、既存機能を修正する予定がある場合に使用してください。

by addyosmani
汎用ソフトウェア開発⭐ リポ 39,967

incremental-implementation

変更を段階的に実施します。複数のファイルに影響する機能や変更を実装する場合に使用してください。大量のコードを一度に書こうとしている場合や、タスクが一度では完結できないほど大きい場合に活用します。

by addyosmani
本サイトは GitHub 上で公開されているオープンソースの SKILL.md ファイルをクロール・インデックス化したものです。 各スキルの著作権は原作者に帰属します。掲載に問題がある場合は info@alsel.co.jp または /takedown フォームよりご連絡ください。
原作者: dotnet · dotnet/skills · ライセンス: MIT